![]() Image content with specific types of fabric or distant building details are potentially problematic. Despite a more challenging filter layout the engineers at Phase One have managed to make support for this new filter layout in Capture One 7.1, yielding natural colors and excellent detail rendition.Ī camera with an image sensor that uses the Bayer Color filter layout can run the risk of producing moiré when photographing fine structures. Fujifilm’s new color filter layout is based on a 6×6 pixel pseudo random color filter pattern (as opposed to the traditional 2×2). In 2012 Fujifilm introduced a completely new Color filter layout named X-Trans. Using the Capture One 7 processing engine it is possible to achieve an amazing level of detail and precise color from RAW files using this color filter layout. The quality that can be derived from the Bayer filter layout has been well proven throughout the years. Over the years Phase One has constantly been working on improving the algorithms for converting the RAW data captured by the sensor to a full RGB file, a process often referred to as Bayer interpolation. ![]() These fully supported RAW files all come from cameras using the Bayer Color filter layout. You can avoid worms by masking out certain textures or by just having a generally softer photo.For more than 10 years Capture One has been supporting various RAW files from major camera manufactures. They're purely a result of sharpening, and they exist whether you use Lightroom, Irident or Photoshop sharpening or demosaicing. I've also done a ton of experimentation, and I disagree that the worms have anything to do with demosaicing. I'm going throught the same process and now turning everything off in x-transformer. ![]() I find Iridient's default setting oversharpen and are super "crunchy". I had been using “default settings”, whatever that entails, so apparently it is time to change settings. If someone can do better on different software, I'd very much like to see it. The dpreview test shot from the X-T2 at ISO 12800. It really quite simple, not much extra work at all. Then I can finish editing and add sharpening and NR (different than what I would use in LR alone). In Lr, after I've gone through them, usually cropping and pre-editing as I go, I will select the keepers and just process those through X-Transformer, all the cropping and editing carry over into the DNGs. I always save the original RAFs (you never know what better processor might come along). The worms are not a product of LR sharpening, they are demosaiicing errors that are accentuated by sharpening. If you use it correctly, it works just fine with properly demosaiiced files. Do all your NR and sharpening in Lightroom, yes, I said Lightroom. I also let it handle the lens corrections, which is identical to LR. You want to just use for its superior demosaiicing algorithm. Set it for MORE DETAILED (actually doesn’t make much difference), Set the Iridient Sharpening and NR to NONE, it just changed with the last update, but it probably still sucks - it adds all sorts of ugly artifacts, particularly at high ISOs. I have done extensive experimentation with XT/Lightroom and have come to the same conclusions as some others who've been at this a while.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |